UN
UNFPA Partnership Catalyst

Updated Evidence Base 2024–2026: Key Research for Funding Conversations

UNFPA-R-12Resilience & PartnershipsWorkingAudience: Both1,633 words

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This document compiles the most important new research findings (2024–2026) that UNFPA staff should cite in funding conversations. It focuses on evidence that has been published since the original knowledge base documents were written, with particular attention to: the climate-SRHR causal evidence (now significantly stronger), maternal mortality trends, stillbirth-climate links, GBV data, and economic arguments for SRHR investment.


1. LANDMARK: Heat Exposure and Pregnancy — Nature Medicine Meta-Analysis (November 2024)

Citation: Lakhoo DP et al., "A systematic review and meta-analysis of heat exposure impacts on maternal, fetal and neonatal health," Nature Medicine, Vol. 31, pp. 684–694 (2024).

This is now the definitive reference for the heat-pregnancy nexus. 198 studies across 66 countries, 23 outcomes.

Key Quantified Findings

Outcome Risk Increase
Preterm birth per 1°C increase OR 1.04 (95% CI: 1.03–1.06)
Preterm birth during heatwaves OR 1.26 (95% CI: 1.08–1.47)
Stillbirth from heat exposure OR 1.13 (95% CI: 0.95–1.34)
Congenital anomalies OR 1.48 (95% CI: 1.16–1.88)
Gestational diabetes OR 1.28 (95% CI: 1.05–1.74)

Limitation: Studies skewed toward high-income (63.3%) and temperate-zone countries (40.1%). Asian-specific studies are emerging but underrepresented.

Why this matters for funders: This is peer-reviewed evidence in one of the world's highest-impact medical journals establishing that climate change directly harms pregnancy outcomes. The causal pathway previously cited in UNFPA-R-02 is now quantified at meta-analytic level.


2. AJOG Scoping Review: Climate Drivers and Maternal Health (2025)

Citation: Published in AJOG Global Reports (2025). 158 studies from 966 screened.

Key finding: 92.4% of included studies documented statistically significant associations between climate drivers and adverse perinatal outcomes — including preterm birth, low birthweight, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, miscarriage, stillbirth, and maternal death.

Critical gap identified: No evidence-based clinical interventions yet established for preventing heat-related adverse pregnancy outcomes. No pregnancy-specific guidance exists in national heatwave plans globally.


3. Stillbirth and Climate Change: BJOG Expert Review (2024)

Citation: Published in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2024).

Global Stillbirth Data (UNICEF/UNIGME 2024)


4. Climate Central: Pregnancy Heat-Risk Days (2024–2025)

Talking point: "Climate Central data shows climate change has doubled pregnancy heat-risk days globally. In Southeast Asia and the Pacific, pregnant women face additional months of dangerous heat exposure. This is not a future threat — it is happening now."


5. Maternal Mortality: Latest Global Estimates (2025)

Source: WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank: Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2023 (published 2025)

Indicator Figure
Global MMR (2023) 197 per 100,000 (80% UI: 174–234)
Total maternal deaths (2023) ~260,000 (~712/day)
Reduction since 2000 40% (from 328 to 197)
Progress since 2016 Stalled — AARR far below needed
SDG target (2030) <70 per 100,000 — requires 7x acceleration
Conflict country MMR 504 vs. 99 in stable countries
Fragile/conflict countries share 64% of all maternal deaths
15-year-old girl lifetime risk (conflict) 1-in-51 vs. 1-in-593 stable

WHO South-East Asia Region


6. Bangladesh Khulna SRHR Study (2025) — Country-Specific Evidence

Citation: Dijkerman S, Hossain J, Persson M, Konika RA, Paul D. Published in Women's Health (SAGE Journals, 2025). DOI: 10.1177/17455057251339283.

The first study to apply an intersectional climate justice lens to SRHR in Bangladesh. Study site: four communities in Dacope upazila, Khulna — severely impacted by Cyclone Bulbul (2019) and repeated flooding.

Key findings:

Authors' conclusion: "Climate resilience cannot be achieved without addressing sexual and reproductive health and rights."


7. WHO/HRP Climate-SRHR Research Agenda (2025)

WHO issued a formal call for research proposals identifying ten priority research questions at the climate-SRHR intersection. Four priority outcome areas:

  1. Maternal health
  2. Gender-based violence
  3. Contraception access
  4. Abortion care

The WHO/HRP and UNFPA co-authored scoping review (BMJ Public Health, August 2024) confirmed: extreme temperatures, cyclones, floods, and droughts are associated with reduced birth weight, preterm births, stillbirths, pregnancy complications, and maternal deaths. Major gaps: abortion care, reproductive cancers, and contraception use.


8. Lancet Countdown SIDS Report (December 2024)

Citation: First comprehensive Lancet Countdown report on health and climate change in SIDS. 35 authors, 59 countries.

Pacific-specific findings:


9. GBV and Climate: Updated Evidence


10. Economic Arguments for SRHR Investment

Return on Investment

Investment Return
$1 in contraceptives $120 in health, education, and economic savings (Guttmacher)
$1 in immunisation (GAVI benchmark) $21 in healthcare/productivity savings
Closing gender gaps in Asia-Pacific $4.5 trillion additional annual GDP
$79 billion additional SRHR investment in LMICs by 2030 400 million unplanned pregnancies averted; 1 million lives saved (UNFPA SWP 2024)

The Underinvestment Case


11. UNFPA Strategic Plan 2026–2029: Key Evidence Anchors

The new Strategic Plan (adopted July 2025) establishes:

MOPAN 2025 assessment gap: UNFPA lacks a dedicated climate strategy with clear objectives, indicators, and targets — being addressed through the new strategic plan.


HOW TO USE THIS EVIDENCE IN FUNDER MEETINGS

For Climate Funders

Lead with: Nature Medicine meta-analysis (heat → preterm birth OR 1.26 during heatwaves), Climate Central pregnancy heat-risk doubling, and the $19.3B GCF portfolio where SRHR is absent.

For Health Systems Funders

Lead with: 260,000 maternal deaths/year (stalled since 2016), 900,000 midwife shortage, 1.9 million stillbirths (40%+ preventable with skilled attendance), and UNFPA's $516M procurement capacity.

For Gender Equity Funders

Lead with: $4.5 trillion GDP opportunity from closing gender gaps, $1.7 trillion women's finance gap, and Gates Foundation's $2.5B women's health commitment signalling market validation.

For Impact Investors

Lead with: Utkrisht DIB (13,449 deaths averted, $9M), UNFPA's 34.9% localisation rate (above Grand Bargain target), and MAS 2x blended finance recognition making SRHR investments economically efficient.


SOURCES

All citations provided in-text. Key sources:

Evidence quality rating: Strong for heat-pregnancy nexus (Nature Medicine meta-analysis). Strong for maternal mortality figures (UN MMEIG). Moderate for climate-GBV causal pathways (systematic review level). Strong for economic returns (Guttmacher, McKinsey, WEF). Moderate for country-specific evidence (single studies, not replicated). The overall evidence base for the climate-SRHR nexus has strengthened significantly between 2024–2026.

Something wrong or missing?

Flag an error, suggest a correction, or add context.

Send Feedback
← Back to Knowledge Base